Price-gouging. So sick of hearing that word.    
International Rugby Board boss Mike Miller was at it again      last week, lecturing New Zealand businesses, especially in      the accommodation sector, on the evils of raising prices      during the coming World Cup.    
This is, of course, the same IRB that charges $31 to watch      Japan v Canada in Napier, and $797 to watch a semifinal      potentially involving the All Blacks at Eden Park. No gouging      there.    
The inherent contradiction in Miller's argument is that the      World Cup has been sold to the New Zealand public as an      economic boon - yet the same public is now being castigated      for trying to make money.    
Miller suggests the major chains are being responsible, but      the smaller operators are being greedy. So the big boys      deserve a clap, and Ma and Pa moteliers should pull their      heads in.    
I suppose he's right. I mean, when I stayed in Cardiff during      the last World Cup, my newspaper paid normal rates. Oh, hang      on.    
The fact is accommodation providers only charge what people      are willing to pay.    
For the IRB, which forces New Zealand-owned stadiums to be      stripped of advertising, and won't even let a school run a      sausage sizzle beside them, to point the finger at us for      seeing financial opportunity in this tournament is rather      hypocritical.    
And from Dunedin's perspective, a little gratitude for      building the best stadium in the country might be nice.    
• The Glasshouse ...
Around the office, they are calling me The Politician.    
For I have flip-flopped again on the issue that has dominated      this fine city for six (seven? eight?) years now: that      aforementioned stadium.    
To be fair, I have only ever opined on the proposals on the      table, and they changed over the years.    
When the idea was for ratepayers to chip in a few million to      do up Carisbrook, I was all for it, much to the anti camp's      disgust.    
When that changed to $200 million - from various sources, but      a big hunk from ratepayers - to build fancy new digs, I had      questions relating to necessity and affordability, much to      the pro camp's disgust.    
Now the Glasshouse (by far the best nickname) is nearly      complete, and I have been lucky enough to have had a little      tour.    
• ... is worth every cent
And guess what?    
I love it. I'm a shameless bandwagoner. I'm excited about      North Otago v West Coast, and the Phoenix, and the Rugby      World Cup, and the possibility of other sporting and general      events. And I'm cracking jokes with Malcolm Farry like we're      old friends.    
Call me a sell-out, if you like. I'm still sceptical about      the stadium's ability to meet its own bills, and I'm still      disappointed the Carisbrook option was discarded so quickly.    
But I walked in to the great tent last week, caught my      breath, looked up into the heavens and gasped. It's an      extraordinary piece of architecture. Let's make it work.    
• Outrageous fortune
So, you're the New Zealand Rugby Union.    
You have a domestic competition envied by all. It's tribal      and intense, it has a glorious history, and it's a production      line of wonderful talent.    
It also makes sense: three divisions, round robin followed by      finals, automatic promotion and relegation. People LOVE it.    
So, naturally, you decide to pull the house down. First to go      is automatic relegation. Then the round-robin format is      tossed out the window. Then you change the name of the      competition (three times). Then you put four more teams in      the top division, then threaten to drop four teams, then      decide to keep two, then decide to keep four.    
Finally, you split the first division into two, but say the      second division can't be called second division, you alter      the format this year and again for next, you play six days a      week, and you make the inexplicable and, surely, globally      unprecedented decision to allow unions to choose their own      opponents.    
The old NPC lies in ruins, wrecked by the very masters      entrusted with its care.    
And yet ... and yet ... somehow the tinny      buggers got lucky.    
In many ways, the spirit of the old NPC lives on. The      tradition and the tribalism are still there, and the general      dilution of skills creates both a level playing field and a      more free-flowing style.    
Go figure.    
• Your Carisbrook
Well, the clock is ticking on the dear old 'Brook.    
Keep an eye out for a special ODT publication celebrating the      sports ground that evolved into the heart and soul of Otago.    
As part of our reflections on 130 years of history, we'd like      to offer readers the opportunity to have their special      Carisbrook memories published.    
In no more than 200 words, tell me (email below) why the      ground meant so much to you, or recall your favourite      moments.    
• Old Boys memories
Some New Zealand rugby clubs strike it lucky with passionate      historians who produce epic chronicles of decades of      grassroots footy.    
One such is Dunedin's Pirates, which had Winston Cooper and      Mark Fowler to thank for the comprehensive 
Skill and      Crossbones.
Now Oamaru Old Boys has got into the act with a superbly      detailed book, 
144 Years of Rugby, compiled by Roddy      Brown and Leo Breen and assorted club members.    
I'm a little biased - the Meikle name appears more than once      - but I would be surprised if there is a club history with      more information, more statistics and more good yarns.    
I particularly liked the tale of the Old Boys forward pack      pushing the scrum machine against a pole at training one      night. A hefty shove severed a conduit running power to the      lights, and the eight forwards received a mighty shock.    
Flanker Brian Docherty "got a hell of a belt and was left      clutching his arm and uttering expletives. Brian bound looser      than ever after that".    
• No Blair Pocock?
It seems to have been lost in the crush a little but I see      the International Cricket Council has been copping some flak      for naming a Best XI skewed towards modern stars.    
The ICC asked for a public vote and received more than      250,000 votes.    
The team was: Virender Sehwag (India), Sunil Gavaskar      (India), Donald Bradman (Australia), Sachin Tendulkar      (India), Brian Lara (West Indies), Kapil Dev (India), Adam      Gilchrist (Australia), Shane Warne (Australia), Wasim Akram      (Pakistan), Curtly Ambrose (West Indies), Glenn McGrath      (Australia).    
You obviously can't complain about the inclusion of Bradman      and Warne.    
And, of the more modern faces, Tendulkar and Gilchrist      present compelling cases for inclusion, and Sehwag's      astonishing record merits consideration.    
But Dev over Garry Sobers? Ambrose and McGrath over Dennis      Lillee and Malcolm Marshall?    
The modern skew and complete lack of Englishmen has angered      Geoff Boycott, who described the team as "biased" with "no      credibility".